Kokomonster Logo
Kokomonster menu icon

News

Koko News    |   Business   |   25 Mar 2026

Ford Explorer vs. Nissan Pathfinder: Battle of the Three-Row Midsize SUVs

Ford Explorer vs. Nissan Pathfinder: Battle of the Three-Row Midsize SUVs: image

Three-rowmidsizeSUVs, liketheFordExplorerandNissanPathfinder, arepopularchoicesforAmericanfamiliesseekingspaceandversatilitywithoutthefull-sizeSUVorminivanpricetag.

像福特探險家和日產探路者這樣的三排座中型SUV,是美國家庭的熱門選擇,他們既需要空間和多功能性,又不想承擔全尺寸SUV或小型貨車的價格。

ExpertsatEdmundstestedthetwomodelstodeterminethebetteroptionbetweentheFordExplorerandNissanPathfinder.

Edmunds 的專家對這兩款車型進行了測試,以確定福特 Explorer 和日產 Pathfinder 哪一款車型更佳。

Ford Explorer vs. Nissan Pathfinder: Battle of the Three-Row Midsize SUVs: image

TheFordExplorer'scomfortlevelsvarybasedontrimandseatingposition, withplushfrontseatsbutlackingcushioninganduncomfortableheadrestsinthesecondandthirdrows.

福特探險者的舒適度因配置和座椅位置而異,前座豪華舒適,但第二排和第三排座椅缺乏緩衝,頭枕也不舒適。

TheNissanPathfinderexcelsinridequalityandpassengercomfort, boastinganadjustabledrivingposition, user-friendlycontrols, andspaciousinterior.

日產探路者在乘坐舒適性和乘客舒適性方面表現出色,擁有可調節的駕駛位置、人性化的控制裝置和寬敞的內部空間。

Ford Explorer vs. Nissan Pathfinder: Battle of the Three-Row Midsize SUVs: image

Intermsofperformance, theFordExploreroffersasportydrivingexperiencewithquickaccelerationandagilehandling, especiallyintheSTtrim.

在性能方面,福特探險者提供了運動化的駕駛體驗,加速迅猛,操控靈活,尤其是在 ST 版本。

Ontheotherhand, theNissanPathfinderfocusesonridecomfortandfunctionality, fallingshortinperformancecomparedtotheExplorer.

另一方面,日產探路者更注重乘坐舒適性和功能性,在性能方面不如探險家。

Ford Explorer vs. Nissan Pathfinder: Battle of the Three-Row Midsize SUVs: image

Bothmodelscomewithadvancedtechnologyfeatures, suchastouchscreendisplaysandconnectivityoptions, withtheFordExplorerofferingmoreUSBportsandGoogleBuilt-Infunctionality.

兩款車型均配備先進的技術功能,例如觸控螢幕顯示器和連接選項,其中福特探險者提供更多的 USB 連接埠和Google內建功能。

Whenitcomestocargospace, thePathfinderandExplorerhavesimilarcapacities, witharound16cubicfeetbehindthethirdrowandupto85cubicfeetwhenallseatsarefoldeddown.

在貨物空間方面,Pathfinder 和 Explorer 的容量相似,第三排座椅後面大約有 16 立方英尺的空間,所有座椅放倒後可達 85 立方英尺。

Ford Explorer vs. Nissan Pathfinder: Battle of the Three-Row Midsize SUVs: image

Three-row midsize SUVs, like the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder, are popular choices for American families seeking space and versatility without the full-size SUV or minivan price tag.

Experts at Edmunds tested the two models to determine the better option between the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder.

Ford Explorer vs. Nissan Pathfinder: Battle of the Three-Row Midsize SUVs: image

The Ford Explorer's comfort levels vary based on trim and seating position, with plush front seats but lacking cushioning and uncomfortable headrests in the second and third rows.

The Nissan Pathfinder excels in ride quality and passenger comfort, boasting an adjustable driving position, user-friendly controls, and spacious interior.

Ford Explorer vs. Nissan Pathfinder: Battle of the Three-Row Midsize SUVs: image

In terms of performance, the Ford Explorer offers a sporty driving experience with quick acceleration and agile handling, especially in the ST trim.

On the other hand, the Nissan Pathfinder focuses on ride comfort and functionality, falling short in performance compared to the Explorer.

Ford Explorer vs. Nissan Pathfinder: Battle of the Three-Row Midsize SUVs: image

Both models come with advanced technology features, such as touchscreen displays and connectivity options, with the Ford Explorer offering more USB ports and Google Built-In functionality.

When it comes to cargo space, the Pathfinder and Explorer have similar capacities, with around 16 cubic feet behind the third row and up to 85 cubic feet when all seats are folded down.